Through the years I have tried many different outline methods.
The method I taught in my early years of teaching preaching was that each major point should be worded as an application. It had some merit since it forced preachers to see listener response in each major point and not just at a segment at the end of the sermon. It helped listeners to respond each step of the way.
Then, I spent several years preaching without any outline. Instead of announcing major points, I simply used logical transitions to move from one segment to the next.
For the past several years my outlining follows the method of Timothy Keller, former pastor at Redeemer NYC. You may not know this but Keller’s method of outlining follows the method of another famous preacher named, Jonathan Edwards. I found that out after listening to hundreds of Keller’s sermons and, later, reading Edwards’ sermons.
My best attempt to explain the method is to say that the outline reflects an attempt to show the logical divisions of a particular idea.
Which brings me to my point in this post.
Now I teach and practice a form of outlining that stems from tracing the argument of a passage. My students know this as the “A” in ABIT.
The outline emerges from the practice of dividing a preaching portion into thought blocks, summarizing each block in a sentence, and identifying the logical transition that exists from block to block.
In this way the practice of tracing the argument contributes to the formation of a preaching outline. And for me, this exercise begins on Monday morning. While I might not create the final wording of the outline until later in the week after my exegesis is complete, I understand how the meaning is made in the pericope.
You probably do something like this to create your outline.
Our outlines may help our listeners keep the sermon from fragmenting into too many ideas. The major points all fit together.
The outline helps me make sure I understand how the author is communicating theology. It is a teaching tool for me. If I can outline it right, I am more confident I can communicate the theology clearly.
And, as always, the goal in such clarity is that our Lord would receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21),
Randal
That works fine if you are only preaching one time in the week. What if you have two sermons and two classes to teach in the week for a total of four topics a week? Would love to only have one sermon a week!
Thanks for reading and commenting. I agree that preaching only once a week would greatly change the study pace, for sure. Actually the method of attaching or allowing an outline to develop from tracing the argument is a huge time-saver. It provides the opportunity to get the big picture of how meaning is made before thinking about what the meaning is. That way, any exegesis to follow is easily inserted into the structure that is communicating theology. May our Lord cause you to flourish as you preach and teach multiple times each week, dear brother.