Category Archives: preacher

Posted on

An Ancient Quote Connected to, Preaching’s Not That Hard

by

Kind of reminds me of all the steps in hermeneutics and homiletics textbooks!

Last week I took a chapter from leading golf instructor, Gavin Flo, and suggested that, “Preaching’s not that hard.” Let me follow that up with a quote from an ancient systematic theology textbook.

In volume 1 of Mastricht’s, Theoretical-Practical Theology, he begins with a chapter, The Best Method of Preaching.

I was relieved to discover that one characteristic of the best method is brevity. [Notice the method is brief, not their sermons!]

I thought you might enjoy hearing what preaching textbooks were like in the middle of the 17th century (Mastricht’s first four books in the TPT were published in 1682), especially in light of my attempt last week to say that preaching’s not that hard.

“To all these things is added the brevity of the method….For I have never been able to approve the practice of those who composed dense volumes concerning the method of preaching, the perusal and reading of which demands as much time of theology students as a proper syntagma [set] of theology” (p. 4)

In typical, ancient form, Mastricht’s explanation of the best method is detailed. If you can access it, you’ll enjoy the examples he provides from a text in Colossians.

If you’re interested in shorter and, possibly not as well-known textbooks on preaching, you might enjoy something like, The Four Pages of the Sermon, by Paul Scott Wilson. Or maybe an older book like, Preaching with Purpose, by Jay Adams.

As I wrote last week, if the Lord continues to allow me the privilege to preach, I will continue to work hard at improving the art and craft. But I hope to do so within the borders of a method that is relatively brief, especially in comparison to a systematic theology set.

May our Lord receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21) as you work your method to the max this week.

Randal

Posted on

Preaching’s Not That Hard

by

Sometimes it’s helpful to simplify what appears to be a very complex action.

Two recent events created this post.

First, I saw this golf teacher, Gavin Flo, on Instagram and heard him say with perfect inflection: “Golf’s not that hard.”

Since I only play golf maybe three times a year at most, I don’t consider myself to be a golfer. My son, Michael, is an excellent golfer and we’ve been able to get out to the driving range a couple of times and play a round or two. That means I am well aware of my weaknesses. Gavin simplifies the action of swinging a golf club and I find it a helpful way for me to learn.

Second, I received an email from a pastor whose wife heard a presentation I gave that combined hermeneutics and homiletics. The wife knew sermon preparation was posing some problems so she handed her husband the notes she took and said he might want to get in touch with me. He did and I offered to meet and talk about the process.

As the pastor described his frustration, he highlighted the fact that textbooks describe so many steps that the process of sermon preparation becomes overwhelming.

So, in the spirit of Gavin Flo, I say: “Preaching’s not that hard.” (with his perfect inflection, of course)

[I need to be honest: golf is hard and if you’ve tried it, you know that. And preaching? But effective teachers of golf and preaching have a way of simplifying the processes. Here’s my attempt to simplify…]

First, as you head into each Sunday sermon, complete this sentence based on your preaching portion: “We worship this morning by ______________.” This is your attempt to show how God designed your Text to function for the church.

Second, allow the structure of your preaching portion to determine the structure of your sermon. This is your attempt to trace the argument or flow of thought in your Text. God conveys theology through structure that may vary from genre to genre.

Third, while you are preaching, from start to finish talk to your listeners about them from the Bible. That’s different from talking to them about the Bible. God is addressing them and so are we.

Finally, while you are preaching, communicate in a way that conveys that this is life and death. This involves genuine-for-you passion, intensity, conviction. This makes the preaching authentic and real.

See. Preaching’s not that hard. And our Lord will receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus as we keep working hard at this incredible privilege and responsibility (Ephesians 3:21).

Randal

P.S. Just like golf, you and I will spend a lifetime trying to improve our skills so let’s keep this concept of “simplify” in perspective.

Posted on

Preaching Grace in the Sermon on the Mount

by

The famous Sermon raises the righteousness bar: “Unless your righteousness exceeds…”

I have been enjoying preaching through Matthew’s gospel for several months this year. The Sermon on the Mount beginning in chapter 5 has been especially enjoyable.

If you are interested in the elements of grace in what is often known as more of a law-kind of text, here are some things I have experienced.

First, because of my recent Ph.D. dissertation on Psalm 119, I had a hyper-awareness to the similarity between the “blessed” in the Psalm and the Beatitudes. It is important that Jesus’s sermon begins with the announcement of blessing. No requirements or rules. Not yet.

Second, Jesus’s first recorded sermon contains the command to “repent” (4:17). So, as Jesus continues to preach about the necessary righteousness, each element of righteousness is a form of repentance, which we know is granted as a gift (cf. Acts 11:18).

Third, and probably the most subtle, is found after the Sermon ends. Matthew 8 begins with two characters displaying tremendous faith in Jesus to heal, first the leper and then the centurion. Matthew positions these narratives in such a way to help readers realize that success in reaching the ultra-righteousness called for in the Sermon is found only through faith in Jesus.

Watch your parishioners while your preaching the Sermon. The bar is raised so high, over and over again. Watch the smiles emerge as you remind them that Jesus commands what He creates. There is no longer the thought of, “I can’t do that!” He has done it and now provides a new desire and capacity for the ultra-righteousness He demands.

Those smiles, sourced in God’s grace, will continue to contribute to His glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21),

Randal

Posted on

How Outlining A Sermon Helps Me, Not Just My Listeners

by

How does outlining help you? And your listeners?

Through the years I have tried many different outline methods.

The method I taught in my early years of teaching preaching was that each major point should be worded as an application. It had some merit since it forced preachers to see listener response in each major point and not just at a segment at the end of the sermon. It helped listeners to respond each step of the way.

Then, I spent several years preaching without any outline. Instead of announcing major points, I simply used logical transitions to move from one segment to the next.

For the past several years my outlining follows the method of Timothy Keller, former pastor at Redeemer NYC. You may not know this but Keller’s method of outlining follows the method of another famous preacher named, Jonathan Edwards. I found that out after listening to hundreds of Keller’s sermons and, later, reading Edwards’ sermons.

My best attempt to explain the method is to say that the outline reflects an attempt to show the logical divisions of a particular idea.

Which brings me to my point in this post.

Now I teach and practice a form of outlining that stems from tracing the argument of a passage. My students know this as the “A” in ABIT.

The outline emerges from the practice of dividing a preaching portion into thought blocks, summarizing each block in a sentence, and identifying the logical transition that exists from block to block.

In this way the practice of tracing the argument contributes to the formation of a preaching outline. And for me, this exercise begins on Monday morning. While I might not create the final wording of the outline until later in the week after my exegesis is complete, I understand how the meaning is made in the pericope.

You probably do something like this to create your outline.

Our outlines may help our listeners keep the sermon from fragmenting into too many ideas. The major points all fit together.

The outline helps me make sure I understand how the author is communicating theology. It is a teaching tool for me. If I can outline it right, I am more confident I can communicate the theology clearly.

And, as always, the goal in such clarity is that our Lord would receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21),

Randal

Posted on

Our Listeners Really Haven’t Changed

by

You can decide whether this quote is encouraging or discouraging; same with the following post.

Back in March I introduced you to the multi-volume set, Theoretical-Practical Theology, by Petrus Van Mastricht. The title is a strong hint as to why I believe the set holds tremendous promise for preaching.

Van “Mastricht argued that the TPT was to be used in the preparation of preaching” (p. xxxix). That’s what makes this volume a special part of my reading this year.

Preachers and homileticians will also be interested in an early chapter, The Best Method of Preaching. Now, remember that the following quote was written in 1682. Tell me whether this sounds familiar…

“I did not produce those disputations in haughtiness, for I cheerfully and frankly confess that they do not possess anything from their learning and erudition that could comment them to anyone–especially not in this most self-indulgent age…” (emphasis added, Preface, p. 3).

Imagine that: Mastricht described his day as a “most self-indulgent age.”

When I read something like that it gives me courage. At times I find myself thinking that all of our technological advances make it more difficult to minister in this day. Mastricht’s description fits our day. Back then people respected ministers more than they do today, but the age of self-indulgence marches on.

One of our responsibilities as preachers and teachers of God’s Word is to continue to call Christ-followers toward self-denial. That sounds like something Jesus taught, more precisely as a prerequisite for following Him.

I asked earlier whether this post would be encouraging or discouraging. Either way it hits you, it potentially keeps us focused on our task. And as we work at this each weekend our Lord receives glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21),

Randal

Posted on

Theological Depth By Implication

by

Theological Depth Is Often Found Through Implication.

I have the privilege recently to be preaching through the early chapters of the Gospel of Matthew. In verses 13-16, Jesus teaches His listeners that they are salt and light.

Explicitly this teaches us about ourselves and how Christ has transformed us into new creations with new spiritual properties.

Implicitly this teaches us about our world.

One sermon segment then can focus attention on what our being salt and light implies concerning the condition of the world in which we live. The logic goes like this:

if we function as salt and light in the world this must imply something about what the world is made of.

The world must need salt and the world must need light. The world needs salt because the world’s substance is subject to decay, let’s say. The world needs light because it is in darkness (I found that one easier).

My point is that as you prepare for this coming Sunday, you can add some theological depth to your sermon by observing implications. God may be stating some things explicitly and you are able to draw conclusions even though God didn’t state that conclusion explicitly.

As is always the case when providing extra-textual data, the way to remain theologically sound is to be sure your implications can be substantiated in the broader context of Scripture. The case above, the implication might not be in Matthew 5:13-16, but it could be in other places in Matthew or in other places in the Canon of Scripture. This gives implication the same authority as the information in our preaching portions.

As you study this week look for strong implication and may our Lord receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21).

Randal

Posted on

An Example of the Second Reason We Might Put our Listeners to Sleep (the Beatitudes)

by

We Could Be Losing our Listeners with our Well-crafted (yawn) Outlines.

A couple of weeks ago I suggest that we contribute to that glazed look (the Steve Carrel pic) by (1) allowing gaps in the emotional connection between our sermon data and our listener’s response and (2) allowing gaps in the logical connection between our sermon data–even main points–and our listener’s response.

In both cases I am talking about responses in terms of worship responses: what God intends for Scripture to do to the Christian.

An example of the second phenomenon is a sermon on the Beatitudes in Matthew 5.

There are nine “Blessed are’s…” in the section (vv. 1-12). I chose to spend two sermons on all nine (I covered the first three and then the final six).

This type of list can easily cause slumber in the seats because of how easy it is to allow gaps in the logical connection between the individual Beatitude and a worship response.

That means we have to work hard at each Beatitude, each main point if you will, to keep the worship response intact.

I did not do a very good job at this because I chose to cover the final six together: how the blessed ones are described.

Then, it was time to play catch up and connect the dots between Beatitude and God’s intention for announcing such blessings: Kingdom-Made Christians…

  • believe the blessing
  • stabilize their hope in this upside down world
  • assess the degree that they mirror these characteristics

I hope you can see that too many minutes between those bullet points and each Beatitude can create the yawns or blank stares.

May our Lord receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21) as work hard to keep strong emotional and logical connections with our listeners who have ears to hear.

Randal

Posted on

Revisiting that First Reason We Might Lose our Listeners

by

He couldn’t take any more of my fascinating biblical history lesson! Go figure.

In the previous post I talked about how the loss of emotional and logical connections can contribute to listener fallout. This weekend I want to elaborate on the first one.

My main preaching mentor, the late Haddon Robinson, taught us a major difference between preaching and lecturing. My own students each year are reminded of the difference between two stances: historical lecturer vs. theological preacher.

Haddon’s words were: the lecturer talks to people about the Bible, while the preacher talks to people about people from the Bible.

It is difficult to find balance, but ideally we want the sermon to sound like we’re talking to our listeners about them throughout the message. In the sermon, the Lord is addressing them and expecting them to respond to His Word.

That means that even those minutes devoted to explaining historical background, for instance, must quickly be reeled back into the preacher’s stance. The historical data, or exegetical data for that matter serves the purpose of theology–Scripture functioning for the Church.

Too many minutes of the lecturer’s stance–talking to them about the Bible–creates a lull in our emotional connection with our listeners.

If you had the courage to listen to a recent sermon, listen to which stance you’re in most of the time. You might find that you’re conditioned to be a lecturer. And you might try to reframe your delivery so that you talk to your listeners about them from the Bible. It will be more difficult for them to fall asleep on you if you’re talking to them about them and, as always, our Lord will receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21).

Randal

Posted on

Two Reasons We Might Lose Our Listeners

by

At times, we might contribute to this classic parishioner, blank stare.

One advantage of experiencing a couple of surgeries to extract a 6mm kidney stone from my right kidney was the opportunity to listen to a couple of sermons.

Preachers can relate to this. I was sincerely wanting to worship, not critique the sermon. But while I was worshiping, the homiletician in me thought, “Try to figure out the cause of the blank stare syndrome.”

I came up with two things over the past few weeks. They may help you as you prepare to preach.

First, I help create the blank stare when there is a lull in the emotional connection. There are sermon minutes filled with minutia that do not engage the listener. The data is not connected to any worship response. Many listeners who take God’s Word seriously will endure these minutes until the impact returns. But it’s painful for them and I don’t wan to cause this.

Second, I also help create the blank stare when there is a break in the logical flow of the subject matter. Too many minutes elapse as too many details are disconnected to the main worship response. And this can all happen within a well-crafted outline. Listeners easily lose their place in a sermon. Sometimes we lead them down this path of inactive learning by not connecting the individual concepts to their worship.

The two reasons I’ve listed cover the emotional and logical components of listening. Both are equally important for communication.

When you’re on vacation this summer and you’re a worshiper, play the reason-for-the-blank-stare game. God knows why you’re doing it. You want to be a better preacher. See if you experience what I did and for similar reasons.

And He will receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21) because of His gift and your extra effort to improve.

Randal

Posted on

Preaching With A Kidney Stone

by

Preaching While Dealing With A Kidney Stone! Yikes!

First, I have been out of commission for a couple of weeks due to fighting a kidney stone. To make a long story short, the first surgery was unsuccessful and the second surgery is scheduled for tomorrow.

The first surgery left me with a temporary stent in my right kidney. That stent prevented me from having another painful attack, but left me with nasty UTI-like symptoms. My main concern, apart from the occasional pain and discomfort, was whether or not I could preach yesterday without feeling like I had to go to the bathroom. And, trust me, with a stent in the ole saying, “When you gotta go, you gotta go,” is reality.

All that to say, this was one of those rare times in my 30 plus years of preaching that I had to preach not knowing whether I was up to the task physically.

If you’ve experienced something similar, then you know what that meant: I had to trust God more than normal.

I don’t like admitting that, but it’s true. I would rather write that I always trust God to the same degree for every sermon. But there is something about suffering for a couple of weeks that elevates the need for God’s help.

[I am keeping the past two weeks in perspective because I have parishioners who have been battling far greater suffering for much longer.]

Yesterday was a good reminder that God is merciful and I need His mercy, sometimes to a greater degree. The great thing about preaching is that it is God’s work. We do have a part to play in it, but I know He knows how much we need Him, especially when we’re struggling.

God was very gracious to me yesterday. I was able to preach a full-length message without having to run to the bathroom mid-sentence.

I hope you never have to preach with a kidney stone, but if you do our Lord will receive glory in the church and in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 3:21) as you entrust the sermon to His care.

Randal